We now have, fittingly, a low-life back-door political appointee to the Low Counties; I'm sure the Republican Party's interests will be well served, but what about mine?.
See Bush Bypasses Senate
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." --Samuel Clemens
2 comments:
Recess appointments have been used by most presidents. It dates al the way back to pres. George Washington.
Bill Clinton himself appointed many , many people via recess appointments (http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RS21308.pdf). Including the ambassador to Luxembourg. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recess_appointment)
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just pointing out it's politics as usual.
Because politics are fluid, situational, and money-driven, a measure of an overtly political act is the repercussions that result. For a "compassionate conservative" looking to find a positive legacy, why does Bush seem to find confrontational approaches to governance? Picking more fights with the Congress seems like he's trying to prove a small point, just because he can't do now what he wants to do elsewhere.
And when I go to Belgium, what's this guy going to do for me?
Post a Comment